The "San Juan Worm"

The often-maligned "San Juan Worm"actually represents an aquatic annelid closely related
to common earthworms named Tubifex tubifex. These thread-like worms that live in the mud on stream bottoms are a
critical host in the life cycle of WD. In the absence of Tubifex worms, the life cycle is broken and the disease
cannot prosper. The severity of infection within a river's trout population could well depend on the abundance
and distribution of Tubifex worms. Daniel Gustafson, an aquatic entomologist at Montana State University, is
studying how Tubifex tubifex intereacts as a host in the transmition of whirling disease. He observes that in
Europe this is a perfect parasite -- one that does not kill its host, the brown trout. The two organisms have
evolved amicably there; but not in North America, where cerebralis has suddenly become the scourge of Western coldwater
fisheries, killing young-of-the-year fish from Colorado to Montana and on into the West Slope watersheds. Here
are some of Gustafson's preliminary observations:
- Tubifex worms are apparently not common in the West, only where man has modified the natural habitat.
- The worms favor aquatic habitat that remains uniformly cold throughout the year.
- In aquatic habitats that warm significantly during the summer the worms do not survive well.
- The worms flourish in cold-water habitats that are relatively impoverished, i.e. low in densities of other
aquatic life forms.
- The European experience shows that when tubifex worm habitat is cleaned of human influence, worm densities drop.
This may suggest that worm habitat modification can be a management tool available to fisheries managers.
General Risk Assessment
Daniel Gustafson, Ph.D.
Based on samples from many whirling disease positive sites, barely detectable levels of Tubifex are enough to
cause major disease problems for the fish. It is important to note that even 50 worms per square meter would be hard
to find in most samples, but these could add up to millions per mile. That should be enough to swamp the fish with
parasites! The spores, worms and young fish are naturally concentrated in many streams.
Low Risk Areas
- Wild and unimpacted Rocky Mountain streams and rivers -- Streams and rivers that have their normal, highly diverse
insect community intact make very poor Tubifex tubifex habitat. This includes many headwater streams, but
fewer rivers. Note that an upstream tributary that has Tubifex and whirling disease, may cause problems in
a stream that otherwise looks safe from whirling disease.
- Warm trout waters -- Tubifex appears to drop out of warm water before trout do, at least during the critical
summer period when the young-of-the-year fish are most vulnerable to the parasite.
In Montana these will generally be rivers rather than streams. For the entomologist, this transition occurs about when
Claassenia outnumbers Hesperoperla.
These waters will be fairly comfortable swimming nearly all day, during the summer. Ilyodrilus templetoni is
often very abundant in these places. Again, an upstream tributary could be a TAM source and thus threaten these waters.
- Lake outflows- Tubifex is conspicuously missing from the outflows of large, natural lakes.
Even when the inflow to the lake is loaded with Tubifex, the outflow has Tubifex greatly reduced.
Many of these streams have poor communities and it seems probable that temperature is important. Rhyacodrilus
coccineus is often very abundant in these places. Lakes also seem to block the downstream movement of the free parasite.
High Risk Areas
- Spring Creeks -- Tubifex tubifex is normally present in almost all Montana spring creeks where trout live.
It usually occurs in great abundance along with handful of other species that are also adapted to the unusual biological
conditions found in springs. Persons making a "quick visit before dark" to a spring creek after "a day on the river"
should be especially careful not introduce viable biological material of any kind.
- Tailwater streams and rivers -- No other single human-caused disturbance so quickly and clearly reduces the high
biodiversity of Rocky Mountain streams and encourages Tubifex tubifex. The tailwaters which are not
already known to be infected with the disease should be protected to the extend possible. In particular, the
Big Horn River, the Madison River between Hebgen Dam and Quake Lake, and the West Fork of the Bitterroot River
all deserve special care.
- Impacted Streams and Rivers, and all canals --
Almost any stream or river that is significantly impacted by urban, agricultural or foresty practices is likely to
support Tubifex tubifex. Grazing with its sediment and manure loading, is the most frequent cause of Tubifex in Montana streams.
Lakes
The dynamics of whirling disease in lakes is not known. Most salmonids spawn and rear for some time in streams anyway.
Tubifex is generally absent in the warm shallow water of lakes, but it is probably abundant in the deep
parts of most Montana lakes. As with spring creeks, springs in lakes should support Tubifex.
These springs may also be the only place salmonids reproduce in many lakes. These should be high risk for whirling
disease. Very cold, high mountain lakes have worms that are probably Tubifex living even in shallow,
shoreline areas (so far, I have seen only immature worms). Again, salmonids may spawn in these areas.
-- D.L. Gustafson